|
| .. |
|
|
THE FIREMAN'S BALL

Review by Michael Jacobson
Stars:
Jan Vostrcil, Josef Kolb, Jan Stockl, Stanislav Holubec, Frantisek Svet
Director: Milos Forman
Audio: Dolby Digital Mono
Video: Full Frame 1.33:1
Studio: Criterion
Features: Milos Forman Interview,
About the Transfer
Length: 73 Minutes
Release Date: February 12, 2002
“If
the people stole the lottery, they cannot win it!”
“What
about the people who honestly bought tickets, but didn’t steal?”
“They
should have stolen.”
The
Fireman’s Ball was Czech director Milos Forman’s first color film, and his last
creative hurrah in his native land before the arrival of the Russians.
On the one hand, it’s a rather uneven, graceless comedy whose primary
humor probably doesn’t much survive the translation outside of a Socialist
state. On the other hand, no movie
banned forever by the Communist Party can be considered all bad.
With
all the recent news about the heroism of firefighters, it’s a little amusing
to see a picture where they are hopelessly inept, both as individuals and as a
group. They are trying to stage the
gala event of the title, but it’s a disaster from the start…their attempt to
hold a beauty contest is a disorganized fiasco. Their precious lottery table gets stolen from repeatedly.
Worst of all, a fire breaks out nearby during the ball, and our intrepid
heroes can’t do much about it!
One
can sense Forman’s sly digs at his Socialist government, but unfortunately,
unless you happen to be a member of such a state yourself, a lot of that humor
is lost. We’re left only with
painful, broad humor that dips into the well once too often.
Some
sequences would be funnier if they weren’t so maddeningly long.
Even in a relatively short film, the beauty pageant scene is driven into
the ground and broken off, as reluctant ladies march into the firemen’s office
for unceremonial judging. When it
comes time to announce their candidates, they can’t get anyone on stage.
The band finishes their song and proceeds to drink their beer while the
emcees are left hanging!
All
the while, the food and prizes from the lottery table keep growing less and less
in number, while the men argue and bicker over who’s supposed to be guarding
it. One of the men’s own wives
helps herself to a head cheese, which provides for an amusing rim shot near the
end of the film.
The
most disturbing sequence, however, is the fire, which rages out of control while
the firemen can’t even get their truck unstuck from the snow.
They manage to save the old man and a few possessions, but the house
burns to the ground while our hapless fighters can only throw meager shovelfuls
of snow at it. They try to
recompense at the ball by having everyone donate their lottery tickets to the
old man, who only grumbles sadly that he needs money, not those tickets,
which are practically worthless by that time anyway.
The only amusing part is that the waiter from the ball tries to collect
his bills from the attendees, who all vacated the venue to watch the fire.
All
of these are political in-jokes…the people under the Socialist government were
impoverished and starving, so yes, there was theft. The firemen, like the political machine, was disorganized,
clueless, and when it came right down to it, unable to do one job they were
supposed to do. But change the
politics of the audience, and these become mere socio-economic footnotes, and
not forces that drive the humor. What’s
left is a meandering comedy with no rhythm, no memorable or distinctive
characters, and only a few laughs.
The
bright side, however, is that the film’s ultimate banishment from Russian
controlled Czechoslovakia paved the way for Forman’s journey west, where he
has since repeatedly defended The Fireman’s Ball, but more importantly,
gone on to make acclaimed and beloved movies here in America.
Perhaps
it’s best to view the movie like the old chairman receiving his honorary award
at the end. He finds the box empty
(naturally), but stoically hides his disappointment and goes on.
Video
***
This
is a very good color transfer from Criterion, preserving the integrity of
Forman’s images with natural looking tones, sharply defined images and no
instances of bleeding or blurring. Grain
is mostly non-existent; only once or twice is it even slightly noticeable.
The print itself is in very good shape, and not suffering from the usual
marks, spots or fading you might associated with a picture this old.
A quality job from start to finish.
Audio
**1/2
The
simple mono mix is a decent one, with plenty of music and lively dialogue to
give the audio its range and punch. I
noticed no distracting noise or interference…a smooth presentation all the
way.
Features
*1/2
There
is a 15 minute interview with Milos Forman, describing the difficulties in
making and releasing the film (producer Carlo Ponti almost sued to get back his
$65,000, for starters) and how it was received both by the masses and by the
powers at the time. There is also a
5 minute look at the transfer process, featuring Forman and cinematographer
Miroslav Ondricek.
Summary: