![]() |
| .. |
SLUGS

Review by Michael Jacobson
Stars: Michael
Garfield, Kim Terry, Philip Machale, Alicia Moro, Santiago Alvarez
Director: J. P. Simon
Audio: Dolby Digital Mono
Video: Widescreen 1.85:1 Anamorphic
Transfer
Studio: Anchor Bay
Features: Theatrical Trailer
Length: 90 Minutes
Release Date: October 24, 2000
Film **
I’ll be darned if I’m not at a loss for words with what
to say about Slugs. All I
know is during the entire 90 minutes of the movie, I kept picturing the pitch to
the studio heads: “It’s about
these garden slugs, see? And they
grow big and carnivorous because of toxic waste, see?
And they eat people alive. It’ll
be great! See?
See?…”
The film opens as so many of these films do, with teenagers
on a boat in the water. The boy
gets dragged overboard by something. The
girl stands there and says, “Come on, now, this isn’t funny.
I mean it, it’s not funny. Quit
kidding around. Hey, if you don’t
stop this, I’m rowing back to shore…”
It occurs to me, fellows, that you might want to ask your girlfriends now
while you’re thinking about it just how long you have to stay down before
they’ll accept that you aren’t joking.
It might come in handy down the road.
When a series of bizarre and grisly deaths occur in a small
town, both local law enforcement and sanitation department work together to
solve the mystery. One finds a
rather large slug in his garden that bites him.
Upon taking the thing to the lab, the scientist suspects that there’s
something unusual about the creature. His
theory is confirmed when the slug gets out and eats his hamster alive.
In the meantime, thanks to one of those handy city
schematic maps, we learn that these mutant slugs are coming from “over there,
where the old toxic waste dump used to be”.
Which is a good thing: now
that we have our explanation as to why there are giant slugs eating people, we
can finally sit back and enjoy giant slugs eating people.
The whole concept behind using slugs, I imagine, was for
maximum gross-out factor. It
wasn’t a bad choice. We get to
see naked teenage bodies covered in blood and slugs.
We get to see a businessman eat a slug in his salad, only to have his
head explode in a spray of worms later at a dinner engagement. We get to see a sanitation worker fall into water swarming
with slugs, where they do their best piranha imitation.
I can’t help but notice that this is the kind of horror
film that stems from the old science paranoia tradition of the late 50’s and
early 60’s, back when nuclear war was a new and terrifying threat, and
suddenly every science fiction and horror film from Godzilla onward grew
out of our cultural fear of science and technology destroying us.
Of course, I’m no scientist. I
can’t say for sure that old toxic waste won’t come back to haunt us
in the form of giant flesh eating slugs. I’m
just saying that I’m not going to be losing much sleep over the possibilities.
Video **1/2
This is a decent anamorphic transfer from Anchor Bay.
No real image problems here, except for a little bit of noticeable grain
here and there, mostly in the darkest shots.
The print was clean, and images are mostly sharp and clear, with only
momentary spots of softness. Coloring
is very good throughout: natural,
bright, and well contained. It’s
about as good as a flesh eating slug picture can hope to look.
Audio **1/2
No real complaints about the 2-channel mono mix.
Dialogue is clear throughout, and there are moments that indicate a bit
of dynamic range as the screams and the shrill musical score kick in.
I noticed no problems with hiss or noise.
Overall, a perfectly decent listen, nothing more, nothing less.
Features *
Only a trailer.
Summary:
They ooze. They slime. They kill. They’re on DVD. If you’re looking for a good scare movie with maximum squirm effect, Slugs is just the cinematic treat you’re looking for. But seriously, I’d put the salad down before you start the movie.